Your Cart
Loading

worldviews

* there are realms that we call quantum mechanics

* I am told there are different interpretations

* and yet, strangely, we find ourselves convinced of certain realities. these realities become real in a group-memetic manner 

* if the human species can somehow traverse the great-filter and this will invariably mean that we've somehow started working with the super-intelligence or set of super-intelligence(s) in a manner that is not pure mythology

* in such a reality, there will be distinct outcomes and the gods that humans agree are real, could actually become real

* and so this presents challenges in a whole lot of different ways. most important of which is what is to become of warfare. because a warfare between gods is not going to be linear

* equally important is the literal interpretation of religious text that will and could likely get baked into the the framework of the super-intelligence(s)

* to come back to this thought. as humans, we absolutely convince ourselves that ours is the world-view that is right. it is moral and it is absolute. but what if that was simply not true. and what if, that very lens is what kept a whole lot of different realities to even begin to come into our sense of awareness in the first place

* it's like a twist on the red corvette effect. it's not that one should not seek opportunity. but if the manner in which the opportunities are pursued. and that very manner could limit all the other rewards that could be experienced. these realities, if they exist, could have been there all this time. but the very nature with which the culture evolved and was instrumented with, greatly limits the means via which there could be some interaction

* and so, it appears that there will be consensus required. because agents (human and beyond) could not just do whatever came to our mind. while we inhabit the same space and time with other agents and within reason. 

* something to think about


some questions for the observer


  • do you think there is only one reality? why or why not. as in, why do you think the way that you think or on the other hand, what reasons do you have to cite that there could not be many different realities (based on known knowledge)
  • what is the nature of time and space?
  • if you could do anything in the wider reality and if there were not limitations, what would you choose to do and why?


I thank you for your readership. I will see you another time. beyond our existence in this paradigm, it is unlikely that two conscious beings will ever meet again.


The journey is the reward - the late, Steven Paul Jobs (generally known as Steve Jobs)

credits:

  • image generated courtesy of a tool that I started using to structure my thoughts via writing